Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2312.11390

On Computing Optimal Temporal Branchings and Spanning Subgraphs

Daniela Bubboloni·Costanza Catalano·Andrea Marino·Ana Silva
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this work we extend the concept of out/in-branchings spanning the vertices of a digraph (also called directed spanning trees) to temporal graphs, which are digraphs where arcs are available only at prescribed times. While the literature has focused on minimum weight/earliest arrival time Temporal Out-Branchings (TOB), we solve the problem for other optimization criteria. In particular, we define five different types of TOBs based on the optimization of the travel duration (FT-TOB), of the departure time (LD-TOB), of the number of transfers (MT-TOB), of the total waiting time (MW-TOB), and of the travelling time (ST-TOB). For D$\in \{$LD,MT,ST$\}$, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a spanning D-TOB; when it does not exist, we characterize the maximum vertex set that a D-TOB can span. Moreover, we provide a log linear algorithm for computing such branchings. For D$\in \{$FT,MW$\}$, we prove that deciding the existence of a spanning D-TOB is NP-complete; we also show that the same results hold for optimal temporal in-branchings. Finally, we investigate the related problem of computing a spanning temporal subgraph with the minimum number of arcs and optimizing a chosen criterion D. This problem turns out to be NP-hard for any D. The hardness results are quite surprising, as computing optimal paths between nodes can always be done in polynomial time.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniela Bubboloni, Costanza Catalano, Andrea Marino, Ana Silva. 2023-12-18. On Computing Optimal Temporal Branchings and Spanning Subgraphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11390

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗