SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2312.12797

Join Sampling under Acyclic Degree Constraints and (Cyclic) Subgraph Sampling

Abstract

Given a join with an acyclic set of degree constraints, we show how to draw a uniformly random sample from the join result in $O(\mathit{polymat}/ \max \{1, \mathrm{OUT} \})$ expected time after a preprocessing of $O(\mathrm{IN})$ expected time, where $\mathrm{IN}$, $\mathrm{OUT}$, and $\mathit{polymat}$ are the join's input size, output size, and polymatroid bound, respectively. This compares favorably with the state of the art (Deng et al.\ and Kim et al., both in PODS'23), which states that a uniformly random sample can be drawn in $\tilde{O}(\mathrm{AGM} / \max \{1, \mathrm{OUT}\})$ expected time after a preprocessing phase of $\tilde{O}(\mathrm{IN})$ expected time, where $\mathrm{AGM}$ is the join's AGM bound. We then utilize our techniques to tackle {\em directed subgraph sampling}. Let $G = (V, E)$ be a directed data graph where each vertex has an out-degree at most $λ$, and let $P$ be a directed pattern graph with $O(1)$ vertices. The objective is to uniformly sample an occurrence of $P$ in $G$. The problem can be modeled as join sampling with input size $\mathrm{IN} = Θ(|E|)$ but, whenever $P$ contains cycles, the converted join has {\em cyclic} degree constraints. We show that it is always possible to throw away certain degree constraints such that (i) the remaining constraints are acyclic and (ii) the new join has asymptotically the same polymatroid bound $\mathit{polymat}$ as the old one. Combining this finding with our new join sampling solution yields an algorithm to sample from the original (cyclic) join (thereby yielding a uniformly random occurrence of $P$) in $O(\mathit{polymat}/ \max \{1, \mathrm{OUT}\})$ expected time after $O(|E|)$ expected-time preprocessing. We also prove similar results for {\em undirected subgraph sampling} and demonstrate how our techniques can be significantly simplified in that scenario.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ru Wang, Yufei Tao. 2023-12-20. Join Sampling under Acyclic Degree Constraints and (Cyclic) Subgraph Sampling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12797

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

OmniTable: A Unified Wide-Table System for Petabyte-Scale LLM Data Curation and Exploration

Data curation is a critical bottleneck in industrial-grade LLM development, where petabyte-scale unstructured corpora are scattered across hundreds of physical tables, feature engineering relies on manual, table-centric pipeline orchestration, and data lineage is largely absent. We present OmniTable as an architecture blueprint for a unified wide-table layer built on Logical Unification, Physical Separation, targeting petabyte-scale LLM data curation and exploration. OmniTable makes four contributions: (1) a unified wide-table abstraction that consolidates multi-source heterogeneous data and thousands of derived features under a single logical schema via logical-physical mapping; (2) declarative feature lifecycle management that automates dependency resolution, execution planning, operator fusion, and lineage tracking, replacing manual pipeline orchestration with a "declare-and-execute" paradigm; (3) an adaptive execution engine with autonomous governance that achieves stable PB-scale feature backfill through heterogeneous compute routing (CPU/GPU), adaptive tuning, UDF-level fault tolerance, and automated storage layout optimization; and (4) hybrid-accelerated data exploration combining a global ID index, transparent OLAP offloading, and background materialized views to deliver second-level point lookups and filtered exports exceeding 20 TB/hour. In production, OmniTable manages over 35 PB of training data across web, code, PDF, and SFT domains, reducing the human-in-the-loop curation cycle from approximately 14 days to approximately 2.5 days (5.6x over the pre-OmniTable production workflow), with consistent feature versioning, auditable lineage, and minimal manual intervention.

cs.DB

When Does Low-Bit Quantization Preserve the Decisions of Vector Search?

Low-bit quantization can achieve high recall on some vector representations and fail sharply on others, while average distortion and global rank correlation do not explain the difference. We study quantized vector search at the level of the comparisons consumed by ranking and graph-pruning algorithms. Our first result is a distribution-free decomposition: the probability that a comparison flips is bounded by the probability mass of exact margins near zero plus the tail probability of the calibrated residual. We then account for dependence between residuals that share a query or graph node, and derive covariance-aware second-moment identities and tail bounds under a joint MGF proxy. For a frozen candidate permutation, we prove a deterministic coupling theorem for Vamana neighbour selection: the approximate replay returns the exact neighbour list exactly when all candidate-level pruning actions agree on the frozen exact states. We connect these results to representation geometry through an exact Gaussian oracle, establish a strict correlation gain from a deterministic magnitude bit in an aligned bilinear model, and give a rare-contamination construction showing why marginal Gaussian diagnostics do not imply the required residual tails. When analytical assumptions are unavailable, a held-out block certificate bounds the selective failure risk of a frozen quantized rule. Across learned, classical, and synthetic embeddings, standardized exact margins predict held-out ranking and pruning flip rates substantially better than global rank correlation. The framework applies to coordinate binary codes, RaBitQ, Lucene BBQ, and product quantizers through a common decision interface.

cs.DB

Contextual Utility of Quantization Moves in Extreme Low-Bit LLMs

Post-training quantizers select finite code changes using reconstruction proxies or local loss approximations, but the utility of a quantization move depends on the state through which it is executed. We identify two sources of this contextual dependence. First, the displacement of the move matters: evaluating the gradient at the move midpoint captures curvature accumulated along the move that a current-state linearization omits. Across frozen two-bit moves from Llama-3.2 models, midpoint evaluation predicts the direction of exact endpoint loss changes substantially more accurately than current-state gradients. Second, moves interact: exhaustive lattices of legal quantized states are well approximated by quadratic pseudo-Boolean functions, yet their small pairwise components can determine Pareto fronts and cause different evaluation functionals to prefer opposite directions. These effects explain failures of reconstruction-optimal code re-selection and additive composition. Reading each move at its own midpoint repairs the local selection step and improves downstream accuracy and held-out perplexity, while larger supports require evaluating exact endpoints from the state actually reached. Exact-endpoint beam search finds sparse changes that dominate much larger one-shot updates, and repricing the same moves after intervening changes produces widespread sign reversals. These results show that quantization utility is contextual at the granularity of a few moves: reliable construction must evaluate finite changes along their own paths and compose them from the evolving quantized state.

cs.DB