SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2312.16034

From Optimal Transport to Efficient Mechanisms for the $m$-Capacitated Facilities Location Problem with Bayesian Agent

Abstract

In this paper, we study of the $m$-Capacitated Facility Location Problem ($m$-CFLP) on the line from a Bayesian Mechanism Design perspective and propose a novel class of mechanisms: the \textit{Extended Ranking Mechanisms} (ERMs). We first show that an ERM is truthful if and only if it satisfies a system of inequalities that depends on the capacities of the facilities we need to place. We then establish a connection between the $m$-CFLP and a norm minimization problem in the Wasserstein space, which enables us to show that if the number of agent goes to infinity the limit of the ratio between the expected Social Cost of an ERM and the expected optimal Social Cost is finite and characterize its value. Noticeably, our method generalizes to encompass other truthful mechanisms and other metrics, such as the $l_p$ and Maximum costs. We conclude our theoretical analysis by characterizing the optimal ERM tailored to a $m$-CFLP and a distribution $\mu$, that is the ERM whose limit Bayesian approximation ratio is the lowest compared to all other feasible ERMs. We consider mainly two frameworks: (i) in the first framework, the total facility capacity matches the number of agents, (ii) in the second framework, $m=2$. When we consider the Maximum Cost, we retrieve the optimal ERM for every $\mu$, while for the Social Cost, we characterize the solution when the measure $\mu$ is symmetric. Lastly, we numerically compare the performance of the ERMs against other truthful mechanisms and evaluate how quickly the Bayesian approximation ratio converges to its limit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gennaro Auricchio, Jie Zhang, Mengxiao Zhang. 2023-12-26. From Optimal Transport to Efficient Mechanisms for the $m$-Capacitated Facilities Location Problem with Bayesian Agent. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16034

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT