SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2312.16273

Coordination and Machine Learning in Multi-Robot Systems: Applications in Robotic Soccer

Abstract

This paper presents the concepts of Artificial Intelligence, Multi-Agent-Systems, Coordination, Intelligent Robotics and Deep Reinforcement Learning. Emphasis is given on and how AI and DRL, may be efficiently used to create efficient robot skills and coordinated robotic teams, capable of performing very complex actions and tasks, such as playing a game of soccer. The paper also presents the concept of robotic soccer and the vision and structure of the RoboCup initiative with emphasis on the Humanoid Simulation 3D league and the new challenges this competition, poses. The final topics presented at the paper are based on the research developed/coordinated by the author throughout the last 22 years in the context of the FCPortugal project. The paper presents a short description of the coordination methodologies developed, such as: Strategy, Tactics, Formations, Setplays, and Coaching Languages and the use of Machine Learning to optimize the use of this concepts. The topics presented also include novel stochastic search algorithms for black box optimization and their use in the optimization of omnidirectional walking skills, robotic multi-agent learning and the creation of a humanoid kick with controlled distance. Finally, new applications using variations of the Proximal Policy Optimization algorithm and advanced modelling for robot and multi-robot learning are briefly explained with emphasis for our new humanoid sprinting and running skills and an amazing humanoid robot soccer dribbling skill. FCPortugal project enabled us to publish more than 100 papers and win several competitions in different leagues and many scientific awards at RoboCup. In total, our team won more than 40 awards in international competitions including a clear victory at the Simulation 3D League at RoboCup 2022 competition, scoring 84 goals and conceding only 2.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luis Paulo Reis. 2023-12-26. Coordination and Machine Learning in Multi-Robot Systems: Applications in Robotic Soccer. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16273

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO