SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2401.03263

Size Minimization For Multi-Output AND-Functions

Abstract

Recent improvements in adder optimization could be achieved by optimizing the AND-trees occurring within the constructed circuits. The overlap of such trees and its potential for pure size optimization has not been taken into account though. Motivated by this, we examine the fundamental problem of minimizing the size of a circuit for multiple AND-functions on intersecting variable sets. Our formulation generalizes the overlapping \AND-trees within adder optimization but is in NP, in contrast to general Boolean circuit optimization which is in $\Sigma_2^p$ (and thus suspected not to be in NP). While restructuring the AND- or XOR-trees simultaneously, we optimize the total number of gates needed for all functions to be computed. We show that this problem is APX-hard already for functions of few variables and present efficient approximation algorithms for the case in which the Boolean functions depend on at most 3 or 4 variables each, achieving guarantees of $\frac 43$ and $1.9$, respectively. To conclude, we give a polynomial approximation algorithm with guarantee $\frac 23k$ for AND-functions of up to $k$ variables. To achieve these results, the key technique is to determine how much overlap among the variable sets makes tree construction cheap and how little makes the optimum solution large.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Susanne Armbruster. 2024-01-06. Size Minimization For Multi-Output AND-Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03263

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS