SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2401.07235

Dynamic Probability Logics: Axiomatization & Definability

Abstract

We first study probabilistic dynamical systems from logical perspective. To this purpose, we introduce the finitary dynamic probability logic} ($\mathsf{DPL}$), as well as its infinitary extension $\mathsf{DPL}_{\omega_1}\!$. Both these logics extend the (modal) probability logic ($\mathsf{PL}$) by adding a temporal-like operator $\bigcirc$ (denoted as dynamic operator) which describes the dynamic part of the system. We subsequently provide Hilbert-style axiomatizations for both $\mathsf{DPL}$ and $\mathsf{DPL}_{\omega_1}\!$. We show that while the proposed axiomatization for $\mathsf{DPL}$ is strongly complete, the axiomatization for the infinitary counterpart supplies strong completeness for each countable fragment $\mathbb{A}$ of $\mathsf{DPL}_{\omega_1}\!$. Secondly, our research focuses on the (frame) definability of important properties of probabilistic dynamical systems such as measure-preserving, ergodicity and mixing within $\mathsf{DPL}$ and $\mathsf{DPL}_{\omega_1}$. Furthermore, we consider the infinitary probability logic $\mathsf{InPL}_{\omega_1}$ (probability logic with initial probability distribution) by disregarding the dynamic operator. This logic studies {\em Markov processes with initial distribution}, i.e. mathematical structures of the form $\langle \Omega, \mathcal{A}, T, \pi\rangle$ where $\langle \Omega, \mathcal{A}\rangle$ is a measurable space, $T: \Omega\times \mathcal{A}\to [0, 1]$ is a Markov kernel and $\pi: \mathcal{A}\to [0, 1]$ is a $\sigma$-additive probability measure. We prove that many natural stochastic properties of Markov processes such as stationary, invariance, irreducibility and recurrence are $\mathsf{InPL}_{\omega_1}$-definable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Somayeh Chopoghloo, Massoud Pourmahdian. 2024-01-14. Dynamic Probability Logics: Axiomatization & Definability. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07235

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO