SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2401.07346

Intuitive but Non-Rigorous Explanations of Infinite Numbers

Abstract

The mathematical study of infinity seems to have the ability to transport the mind to lofty and unusual realms. Decades ago, I was transported in this way by Rudy Rucker's book Infinity and the Mind. Despite much subsequent learning and teaching of mathematics in the service of physics and astronomy, there remained quite a few aspects of the "higher infinities" that I was still far from comprehending. Thus, I wanted to dive back in to understand those ideas and to find good ways to explain them to other non-specialists. These notes are an attempt to do this. They begin by discussing huge (but still describable) finite numbers, then they proceed to the concepts of fixed points, Cantor's countably infinite ordinals, transfinite cardinals and the continuum hypothesis, and then to more recent attempts to define still-larger infinities called large cardinals. I should warn the reader that the author is an astrophysicist, so these pedagogic explanations may not be satisfying (or anywhere nearly sufficiently rigorous) to a mathematician. Still, I hope these explanations provide some intuitive insights about concepts that are too large to fit in the physical universe.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Steven R. Cranmer. 2024-01-14. Intuitive but Non-Rigorous Explanations of Infinite Numbers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07346

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO