SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2402.00041

Spatial-temporal-demand clustering for solving large-scale vehicle routing problems with time windows

Abstract

Several metaheuristics use decomposition and pruning strategies to solve large-scale instances of the vehicle routing problem (VRP). Those complexity reduction techniques often rely on simple, problem-specific rules. However, the growth in available data and advances in computer hardware enable data-based approaches that use machine learning (ML) to improve scalability of solution algorithms. We propose a decompose-route-improve (DRI) framework that groups customers using clustering. Its similarity metric incorporates customers' spatial, temporal, and demand data and is formulated to reflect the problem's objective function and constraints. The resulting sub-routing problems can independently be solved using any suitable algorithm. We apply pruned local search (LS) between solved subproblems to improve the overall solution. Pruning is based on customers' similarity information obtained in the decomposition phase. In a computational study, we parameterize and compare existing clustering algorithms and benchmark the DRI against the Hybrid Genetic Search (HGS) of Vidal et al. (2013). Results show that our data-based approach outperforms classic cluster-first, route-second approaches solely based on customers' spatial information. The newly introduced similarity metric forms separate sub-VRPs and improves the selection of LS moves in the improvement phase. Thus, the DRI scales existing metaheuristics to achieve high-quality solutions faster for large-scale VRPs by efficiently reducing complexity. Further, the DRI can be easily adapted to various solution methods and VRP characteristics, such as distribution of customer locations and demands, depot location, and different time window scenarios, making it a generalizable approach to solving routing problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christoph Kerscher, Stefan Minner. 2024-01-20. Spatial-temporal-demand clustering for solving large-scale vehicle routing problems with time windows. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104409

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI