arXiv · 2402.04429
Meritocracy and Its Discontents: Long-run Effects of Repeated School Admission Reforms
Abstract
What happens if selective colleges change their admission policies? We study this question by analyzing the world's first implementation of nationally centralized meritocratic admissions in the early twentieth century. We find a persistent meritocracy-equity tradeoff. Compared to the decentralized system, the centralized system admitted more high-achievers and produced more occupational elites (such as top income earners) decades later in the labor market. This gain came at a distributional cost, however. Meritocratic centralization also increased the number of urban-born elites relative to rural-born ones, undermining equal access to higher education and career advancement.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Chiaki Moriguchi, Yusuke Narita, Mari Tanaka. 2024-02-06. Meritocracy and Its Discontents: Long-run Effects of Repeated School Admission Reforms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04429
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.