SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2402.07740

The double gamma function and Vladimir Alekseevsky

Abstract

This paper is about a forgotten function and a forgotten mathematician. The double gamma function is now an important special function, which appears for different reasons in many branches of mathematics and in mathematical physics, as it satisfies a large and amusing collection of identities parallel to the classical gamma function. It was discovered and investigated in detail by Vladimir Alekseevsky in 1888-89. We outline his starting point here: considering the Weierstrass product for the entire periodic function $\sin \pi x$ and taking half of the factors corresponding to non-positive roots of the sine, we obtain the function $1/\Gamma(x)$. Considering the Weierstrass product for the doubly quasiperiodic Jacobi theta function $\vartheta_1$ and taking the half of factors we come to the $q$-gamma function (which appears, with a slight change in notation, in Eduard Heine's work). Considering the quarter of the factors (corresponding to the positive quadrant in the lattice $n_1\omega+n_2\omega_2$ of periods), Alekseevsky arrived at his double gamma function. The work in this direction was continued by Ernest Barnes, Jean Beaupin, Godfrey Hardy, and Vladimir Steklov in 1899--1907. After 1907, publications on this topic stopped, and the double gamma appeared again 70 years later due to Takuro Shintani. In this paper we discuss Alekseevsky's seminal work and its genesis, the history of the double gamma, and Alekseevsky's biography (1858-1916).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yury A. Neretin. 2024-02-12. The double gamma function and Vladimir Alekseevsky. https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2026.2651050

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO