Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2402.07771

Insights into $(k,\rho)$-shortcutting algorithms

Alexander Leonhardt·Ulrich Meyer·Manuel Penschuck
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A graph is called a $(k,\rho)$-graph iff every node can reach $\rho$ of its nearest neighbors in at most k hops. This property proved useful in the analysis and design of parallel shortest-path algorithms. Any graph can be transformed into a $(k,\rho)$-graph by adding shortcuts. Formally, the $(k,\rho)$-Minimum-Shortcut problem asks to find an appropriate shortcut set of minimal cardinality. We show that the $(k,\rho)$-Minimum-Shortcut problem is NP-complete in the practical regime of $k \ge 3$ and $\rho = \Theta(n^\epsilon)$ for $\epsilon > 0$. With a related construction, we bound the approximation factor of known $(k,\rho)$-Minimum-Shortcut problem heuristics from below and propose algorithmic countermeasures improving the approximation quality. Further, we describe an integer linear problem (ILP) solving the $(k,\rho)$-Minimum-Shortcut problem optimally. Finally, we compare the practical performance and quality of all algorithms in an empirical campaign.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexander Leonhardt, Ulrich Meyer, Manuel Penschuck. 2024-02-12. Insights into $(k,\rho)$-shortcutting algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07771

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗