The Bottom-Left Algorithm for the Strip Packing Problem

Stefan Hougardy; Bart Zondervan

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2402.16572

The Bottom-Left Algorithm for the Strip Packing Problem

Stefan Hougardy·Bart Zondervan

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The bottom-left algorithm is a simple heuristic for the Strip Packing Problem. It places the rectangles in the given order at the lowest free position in the strip, using the left most position in case of ties. Despite its simplicity, the exact approximation ratio of the bottom-left algorithm remains unknown. We will improve the more-than-40-year-old value for the lower bound from $5/4$ to $4/3 - \varepsilon$. Additionally, we will show that this lower bound holds even in the special case of squares, where the previously known lower bound was $12/11 -\varepsilon$. These lower bounds apply regardless of the ordering of the rectangles. When squares are arranged in the worst possible order, we establish a constant upper bound and a $10/3-\varepsilon$ lower bound for the approximation ratio of the bottom-left algorithm. This bound also applies to some online setting and yields an almost tight result there. Finally, we show that the approximation ratio of a local search algorithm based on permuting rectangles in the ordering of the bottom-left algorithm is at least~$2$ and that such an algorithm may need an exponential number of improvement steps to reach a local optimum.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.DM math.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Stefan Hougardy, Bart Zondervan. 2024-02-26. The Bottom-Left Algorithm for the Strip Packing Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗