SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2403.04542

Near-Optimal Algorithm for Directed Expander Decompositions

Abstract

In this work, we present the first algorithm to compute expander decompositions in an m-edge directed graph with near-optimal time \~O(m). Further, our algorithm can maintain such a decomposition in a dynamic graph and again obtains near-optimal update times. Our result improves over previous algorithms of Bernstein-Probst Gutenberg-Saranurak (FOCS 2020), Hua-Kyng-Probst Gutenberg-Wu (SODA 2023) that only obtained algorithms optimal up to subpolynomial factors. In order to obtain our new algorithm, we present a new push-pull-relabel flow framework that generalizes the classic push-relabel flow algorithm Goldberg-Tarjan (JACM 1988) which was later dynamized for computing expander decompositions in undirected graphs Henzinger-Rao-Wang (SIAM J. Comput. 2020), Saranurak-Wang (SODA 2019). We then show that the flow problems formulated in recent work Hua-Kyng-Probst Gutenberg-Wu (SODA 2023) to decompose directed graphs can be solved much more efficiently in the push-pull-relabel flow framework. Recently, our algorithm has already been employed to obtain the currently fastest algorithm to compute min-cost flows Van den Brand-Chen-Kyng-Liu-Probst Gutenberg-Sachdeva (FOCS 2024). We further believe that our algorithm can be used to speed-up and simplify recent breakthroughs in combinatorial graph algorithms towards fast maximum flow algorithms Chuzhoy-Khanna (SODA 2024), Chuzhoy-Khanna (STOC 2024), Bernstein-Blikstad-Saranurak-Tu (FOCS 2024).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aurelio L. Sulser, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg. 2024-03-07. Near-Optimal Algorithm for Directed Expander Decompositions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04542

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS