SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2403.05099

Generation and decidability for periodic l-pregroups

Abstract

In [11] it is shown that the variety $\mathsf{DLP}$ of distributive l-pregroups is generated by a single algebra, the functional algebra $\mathbf{F}(Z)$ over the integers. Here, we show that $\mathsf{DLP}$ is equal to the join of its subvarieties $\mathsf{LPn}$, for $n\in\mathbb{Z}$, consisting of n-periodic l-pregroups. We also prove that every algebra in $\mathsf{LPn}$ embeds into the subalgebra $\mathbf{F}_n(\Omega)$ of n-periodic elements of $\mathbf{F}(\Omega)$, for some integral chain $\Omega$; we use this representation to show that for every n, the variety $\mathsf{LPn}$ is generated by the single algebra $\mathbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Q}\overrightarrow{\times}\mathbb{Z})$, noting that the chain $\mathbb{Q}\overrightarrow{\times}\mathbb{Z}$ is independent of n. We further establish a second representation theorem: every algebra in $\mathsf{LPn}$ embeds into the wreath product of an l-group and $\mathbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Z})$, showcasing the prominent role of the simple n-periodic l-pregroup $\mathbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Z})$. Moreover, we prove that the join of the varieties $V(\mathbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Z}))$ is also equal to $\mathsf{DLP}$, hence equal to the join of the varieties $\mathsf{LPn}$, even though $\mathsf{V}(\mathbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Z}))$ is not equal to \mathsf{LPn} for every single n. In this sense, $\mathsf{DLP}$ has two different well-behaved approximations. We further prove that, for every n, the equational theory of $\mathbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Z})$ is decidable and, using the wreath product decomposition, we show that the equational theory of $\mathsf{LPn}$ is decidable, as well.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nikolaos Galatos, Isis A. Gallardo. 2024-03-08. Generation and decidability for periodic l-pregroups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05099

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO