Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2403.07931

Formalizing Feint Actions, and Example Studies in Two-Player Games

Junyu Liu·Wangkai Jin·Xiangjun Peng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Feint actions refer to a set of deceptive actions, which enable players to obtain temporal advantages from their opponents. Such actions are regarded as widely-used tactic in most non-deterministic Two-player Games (e.g. boxing and fencing). However, existing literature does not provide comprehensive and concrete formalization on Feint actions, and their implications on Two-Player Games. We argue that a full exploration on Feint actions is of great importance towards more realistic Two-player Games. In this paper, we provide the first comprehensive and concrete formalization of Feint actions. The key idea of our work is to (1) allow automatic generation of Feint actions, via our proposed Palindrome-directed Generation of Feint actions; and (2) provide concrete principles to properly combine Feint and attack actions. Based on our formalization of Feint actions, we also explore the implications on the game strategy model, and provide optimizations to better incorporate Feint actions. Our experimental results shows that accounting for Feint actions in Non-Deterministic Games (1) brings overall benefits to the game design; and (2) has great benefits on on either game animations or strategy designs, which also introduces a great extent of randomness into randomness-demanded Game models.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.GR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Junyu Liu, Wangkai Jin, Xiangjun Peng. 2024-03-03. Formalizing Feint Actions, and Example Studies in Two-Player Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07931

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗