SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2403.11710

Matter and cosmogenesis in Kant's Theory of the Heavens

Abstract

In 1755, Kant published his General Natural History and Theory of the Heavens, in which he presented his hypothesis on the formation of the solar system, known as the primitive nebula hypothesis. This original theory of the heavens was written in dialogue with the conceptions of celestial matter of his time. On the one hand, Kant recognized Descartes' cosmological enterprise as a decisive mechanistic requirement for the intelligence of physics, but his vortices of matter fell into disrepute: Newton invalidated them mathematically. On the other hand, attraction at a distance provides an incomparable explanation of phenomena, but has left a gaping hole in our understanding of the law's material anchorage in bodies, and ultimately sends the question of how the system works back to God. He then set out to overcome the dichotomy established by these two authors, drawing on the Cartesian adage ''give me matter and I'll make a world'', but applying Newton's laws to cosmogenesis. In concrete terms, interplanetary space currently contains no matter capable of explaining the motion of the stars, we need to look further back into the system's past, to find an earlier state of material dispersion whose effects are still being felt. He must assume the existence of a cloud of dust, made up of the simplest elements and moved by the forces of attraction and repulsion alone. From this, Kant can form the hypothesis of the primitive nebula breaking down first into a phase of stellogenesis, and then into the creation of an accretion disk gradually forming the planets and their satellites.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Garance Benoit. 2024-03-18. Matter and cosmogenesis in Kant's Theory of the Heavens. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11710

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Scientific Promise

Scientists constantly face decisions about what lines of research to pursue. This Element introduces the philosophical debate about scientific pursuitworthiness. It explains how it can be rational to pursue a theory even if the theory is less well supported than its rivals, and it discusses existing philosophical frameworks for guiding pursuit decisions. The Element also develops a new perspective. Existing accounts focus predominantly on theories, while experiments are largely neglected. This is an important shortcoming. Theoretical promise depends on experimental promise, and experimental promise raises questions of its own. Drawing on the epistemology of experimentation, the Element advances an account of experimental pursuitworthiness. It is argued that such pursuitworthiness depends on experimental virtues like a clear signal and simplicity of design. Moreover, the kinds of uncertainty that constrain the assessment of scientific pursuits are examined. Finally, the Element highlights open questions in the philosophy of scientific pursuitworthiness.

physics.hist-ph

Is Black Hole Evaporation Prediction Friendly?

Manchak and Weatherall (2018) formulate the black hole information paradox as a failure of predictability in black hole evaporation spacetimes, diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I offer a strategy for resolving this paradox. I argue that failures of predictability in black hole evaporation are not well diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I then consider two weakenings of global hyperbolicity: prediction and retrodiction friendliness, the failure of which could ground a new paradox. However, deidealized black hole evaporation models can be prediction and retrodiction friendly. Therefore, the information paradox cannot be based upon failures of global hyperbolicity, nor either retrodiction or prediction unfriendliness.

physics.hist-ph

The Crab Nebula progenitor: recovering the 1054 AD supernova event as galactic Gamma-ray burst

In 1054 AD a daytime star appeared in the constellation of Taurus, for three weeks, and it was reported in various sources from Europe to China/Japan: it was one of the few documented galactic supernovae of the last two millenia. This paradigm has been established about sixty years ago, as the comprehension of the physics of supernovae progressed with enough observational data. The Gamma-ray bursts were discovered in the same period, but only in the past few years have their observations become daily and their distances have been fully understood as cosmological. After the explosion, the exponential decay of the luminosity in gamma-rays and X-rays has been followed with telescopes onboard dedicated satellites. Also the exponential decay of the afterglow's optical and radio frequencies have been observed with the largest optical and radio telescopes. Within the binary-driven hypernova framework, successful in explaining all the observed phases of the Gamma-ray bursts, the universal exponential decay can be extended to 1000 years after the burst, to account for the present values of Gamma and X-rays as well as optical and radio frequencies of the Crab Nebula. Both the daytime visibility of the burst, and the simultaneous radiation plagues appeared in Constantinople and Cairo is a strong evidence of the presence of Gamma-rays in the lower atmosphere, coming from the same source originating the Crab nebula. The association to the daytime visibility of that star and the following plague meets exactly the etymology of the word dis-aster, bad star.

physics.hist-ph