SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2403.12648

Revisiting Local Computation of PageRank: Simple and Optimal

Abstract

We revisit the classic local graph exploration algorithm ApproxContributions proposed by Andersen, Borgs, Chayes, Hopcroft, Mirrokni, and Teng (WAW '07, Internet Math. '08) for computing an $\epsilon$-approximation of the PageRank contribution vector for a target node $t$ on a graph with $n$ nodes and $m$ edges. We give a worst-case complexity bound of ApproxContributions as $O(n\pi(t)/\epsilon\cdot\min(\Delta_{in},\Delta_{out},\sqrt{m}))$, where $\pi(t)$ is the PageRank score of $t$, and $\Delta_{in}$ and $\Delta_{out}$ are the maximum in-degree and out-degree of the graph, resp. We also give a lower bound of $\Omega(\min(\Delta_{in}/\delta,\Delta_{out}/\delta,\sqrt{m}/\delta,m))$ for detecting the $\delta$-contributing set of $t$, showing that the simple ApproxContributions algorithm is already optimal. We also investigate the computational complexity of locally estimating a node's PageRank centrality. We improve the best-known upper bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^{2/3}\cdot\min(\Delta_{out}^{1/3},m^{1/6}))$ given by Bressan, Peserico, and Pretto (SICOMP '23) to $O(n^{1/2}\cdot\min(\Delta_{in}^{1/2},\Delta_{out}^{1/2},m^{1/4}))$ by simply combining ApproxContributions with the Monte Carlo simulation method. We also improve their lower bound of $\Omega(\min(n^{1/2}\Delta_{out}^{1/2},n^{1/3}m^{1/3}))$ to $\Omega(n^{1/2}\cdot\min(\Delta_{in}^{1/2},\Delta_{out}^{1/2},m^{1/4}))$ if $\min(\Delta_{in},\Delta_{out})=\Omega(n^{1/3})$, and to $\Omega(n^{1/2-\gamma}(\min(\Delta_{in},\Delta_{out}))^{1/2+\gamma})$ if $\min(\Delta_{in},\Delta_{out})=o(n^{1/3})$, where $\gamma>0$ is an arbitrarily small constant. Our matching upper and lower bounds resolve the open problem of whether one can tighten the bounds given by Bressan, Peserico, and Pretto (FOCS '18, SICOMP '23). Remarkably, the techniques and analyses for proving all our results are surprisingly simple.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hanzhi Wang, Zhewei Wei, Ji-Rong Wen, Mingji Yang. 2024-03-19. Revisiting Local Computation of PageRank: Simple and Optimal. https://doi.org/10.1145/3618260.3649661

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS