SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2403.13644

How to Relax Instantly: Elastic Relaxation of Concurrent Data Structures

Abstract

The sequential semantics of many concurrent data structures, such as stacks and queues, inevitably lead to memory contention in parallel environments, thus limiting scalability. Semantic relaxation has the potential to address this issue, increasing the parallelism at the expense of weakened semantics. Although prior research has shown that improved performance can be attained by relaxing concurrent data structure semantics, there is no one-size-fits-all relaxation that adequately addresses the varying needs of dynamic executions. In this paper, we first introduce the concept of elastic relaxation and consequently present the Lateral structure, which is an algorithmic component capable of supporting the design of elastically relaxed concurrent data structures. Using the Lateral , we design novel elastically relaxed, lock-free queues and stacks capable of reconfiguring relaxation during run time. We establish linearizability and define upper bounds for relaxation errors in our designs. Experimental evaluations show that our elastic designs hold up against state-of-the-art statically relaxed designs, while also swiftly managing trade-offs between relaxation and operational latency. We also outline how to use the Lateral to design elastically relaxed lock-free counters and deques.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kåre von Geijer, Philippas Tsigas. 2024-03-20. How to Relax Instantly: Elastic Relaxation of Concurrent Data Structures. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13644

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS