SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2403.17087

Sparse inference in Poisson Log-Normal model by approximating the L0-norm

Abstract

Variable selection methods are required in practical statistical modeling, to identify and include only the most relevant predictors, and then improving model interpretability. Such variable selection methods are typically employed in regression models, for instance in this article for the Poisson Log Normal model (PLN, Chiquet et al., 2021). This model aim to explain multivariate count data using dependent variables, and its utility was demonstrating in scientific fields such as ecology and agronomy. In the case of the PLN model, most recent papers focus on sparse networks inference through combination of the likelihood with a L1 -penalty on the precision matrix. In this paper, we propose to rely on a recent penalization method (SIC, O'Neill and Burke, 2023), which consists in smoothly approximating the L0-penalty, and that avoids the calibration of a tuning parameter with a cross-validation procedure. Moreover, this work focuses on the coefficient matrix of the PLN model and establishes an inference procedure ensuring effective variable selection performance, so that the resulting fitted model explaining multivariate count data using only relevant explanatory variables. Our proposal involves implementing a procedure that integrates the SIC penalization algorithm (epsilon-telescoping) and the PLN model fitting algorithm (a variational EM algorithm). To support our proposal, we provide theoretical results and insights about the penalization method, and we perform simulation studies to assess the method, which is also applied on real datasets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Togo Jean Yves Kioye, Paul-Marie Grollemund, Jocelyn Chauvet, Pierre Druilhet, Erwan Saint-Loubert-Bie, Christophe Chassard. 2024-03-25. Sparse inference in Poisson Log-Normal model by approximating the L0-norm. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17087

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME