First-order (coarse) correlated equilibria in non-concave games

Abstract

We investigate first-order notions of correlated equilibria in smooth games, in which players do not incur any regret against small modifications of their actions prescribed by some vector field. We define two such notions, based on local deviations and on stationarity of the distribution, and identify the notion of coarseness as the setting where the strategy modifications are prescribed by gradient fields. For coarse equilibria, we prove that online (projected) gradient ascent has a universal approximation property for both variants of equilibrium; in the self-play setting, every differentiable function induces an equilibrium constraint, the approximation error of which depends on the modulus of continuity and magnitude of the gradient. In the adversarial setting, we instead obtain a characterisation of regret guarantees against continuous strategy modifications satisfied by projected gradient ascent; these are precisely deviations induced by gradient fields tangent to the action set. We also provide a generalisation of the Lagrangian Hedging framework, which identifies a novel refinement of correlated equilibrium which is tractable to approximate. We then study the primal-dual framework to our notion of first-order equilibria. For coarse equilibria defined by a family of functions, we find that a dual bound on the worst-case expectation of a performance metric takes the form of a generalised Lyapunov function for the dynamics of the game. Specifically, usual primal-dual price of anarchy analysis for coarse correlated equilibria as well as the smoothness framework of Roughgarden are both equivalent to a problem of general Lyapunov function estimation. For non-coarse equilibria, we instead observe that price of anarchy problems are dual to a vector field fit problem for the gradient dynamics of the game.