Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2403.20165

A Simple and Efficient Algorithm for Sorting Signed Permutations by Reversals

Krister M. Swenson
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 1937, biologists Sturtevant and Tan posed a computational question: transform a chromosome represented by a permutation of genes, into a second permutation, using a minimum-length sequence of reversals, each inverting the order of a contiguous subset of elements. Solutions to this problem, applied to Drosophila chromosomes, were computed by hand. The first algorithmic result was a heuristic that was published in 1982. In the 1990s a more biologically relevant version of the problem, where the elements have signs that are also inverted by a reversal, finally received serious attention by the computer science community. This effort eventually resulted in the first polynomial time algorithm for Signed Sorting by Reversals. Since then, a dozen more articles have been dedicated to simplifying the theory and developing algorithms with improved running times. The current best algorithm, which runs in $O(n \log^2 n / \log\log n)$ time, fails to meet what some consider to be the likely lower bound of $O(n \log n)$. In this article, we present the first algorithm that runs in $O(n \log n)$ time in the worst case. The algorithm is fairly simple to implement, and the running time hides very low constants.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Krister M. Swenson. 2024-03-29. A Simple and Efficient Algorithm for Sorting Signed Permutations by Reversals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.20165

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗