Optimal quantile estimation: beyond the comparison model

Meghal Gupta; Mihir Singhal; Hongxun Wu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2404.03847

Optimal quantile estimation: beyond the comparison model

Meghal Gupta·Mihir Singhal·Hongxun Wu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Estimating quantiles is one of the foundational problems of data sketching. Given $n$ elements $x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n$ from some universe of size $U$ arriving in a data stream, a quantile sketch estimates the rank of any element with additive error at most $\varepsilon n$. A low-space algorithm solving this task has applications in database systems, network measurement, load balancing, and many other practical scenarios. Current quantile estimation algorithms described as optimal include the GK sketch (Greenwald and Khanna 2001) using $O(\varepsilon^{-1} \log n)$ words (deterministic) and the KLL sketch (Karnin, Lang, and Liberty 2016) using $O(\varepsilon^{-1} \log\log(1/\delta))$ words (randomized, with failure probability $\delta$). However, both algorithms are only optimal in the comparison-based model, whereas most typical applications involve streams of integers that the sketch can use aside from making comparisons. If we go beyond the comparison-based model, the deterministic q-digest sketch (Shrivastava, Buragohain, Agrawal, and Suri 2004) achieves a space complexity of $O(\varepsilon^{-1}\log U)$ words, which is incomparable to the previously-mentioned sketches. It has long been asked whether there is a quantile sketch using $O(\varepsilon^{-1})$ words of space (which is optimal as long as $n \leq \mathrm{poly}(U)$). In this work, we present a deterministic algorithm using $O(\varepsilon^{-1})$ words, resolving this line of work.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Meghal Gupta, Mihir Singhal, Hongxun Wu. 2024-04-05. Optimal quantile estimation: beyond the comparison model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03847

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗