SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2404.06069

Fully Dynamic Matching and Ordered Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi Graphs

Abstract

We study the fully dynamic maximum matching problem. In this problem, the goal is to efficiently maintain an approximate maximum matching of a graph that is subject to edge insertions and deletions. Our focus is on algorithms that maintain the edges of a $(1-\epsilon)$-approximate maximum matching for an arbitrarily small constant $\epsilon > 0$. Until recently, the fastest known algorithm for this problem required $\Theta(n)$ time per update where $n$ is the number of vertices. This bound was slightly improved to $n/(\log^* n)^{\Omega(1)}$ by Assadi, Behnezhad, Khanna, and Li [STOC'23] and very recently to $n/2^{\Omega(\sqrt{\log n})}$ by Liu [FOCS'24]. Whether this can be improved to $n^{1-\Omega(1)}$ remains a major open problem. In this paper, we introduce {\em Ordered Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi (ORS)} graphs (a generalization of Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi graphs) and show that the complexity of dynamic matching is closely tied to them. For $\delta > 0$, define $ORS(\delta n)$ to be the maximum number of matchings $M_1, \ldots, M_t$, each of size $\delta n$, that one can pack in an $n$-vertex graph such that each matching $M_i$ is an {\em induced matching} in subgraph $M_1 \cup \ldots \cup M_{i}$. We show that there is a randomized algorithm that maintains a $(1-\epsilon)$-approximate maximum matching of a fully dynamic graph in $$ \widetilde{O}\left( \sqrt{n^{1+\epsilon} \cdot ORS(\Theta_\epsilon(n))} \right) $$ amortized update-time. While the value of $ORS(\Theta(n))$ remains unknown and is only upper bounded by $n^{1-o(1)}$, the densest construction known from more than two decades ago only achieves $ORS(\Theta(n)) \geq n^{1/\Theta(\log \log n)} = n^{o(1)}$ [Fischer et al. STOC'02]. If this is close to the right bound, then our algorithm achieves an update-time of $\sqrt{n^{1+O(\epsilon)}}$, resolving the aforementioned longstanding open problem in dynamic algorithms in a strong sense.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Soheil Behnezhad, Alma Ghafari. 2024-04-09. Fully Dynamic Matching and Ordered Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS