SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2404.09018

Arrow-Sen theory simplified

Abstract

The traditional Arrow--Sen Social Choice Theory $\bf{TSCT}$ is a mathematical theory built apparently on higher--order formal language. In this paper, we propose a reformulation and reclassification of the $\bf{TSCT}$ axioms in order to obtain a simpler theory based on the first--order language axioms, keeping the spirit of original ideas. This new theory, called Simplified Social Choice Theory, denoted by $\bf{SSCT}$, presents a sub--theory of $\bf{TSCT}$. Roughly speaking, we extract all quatifications over $n$--tuples of binary relations from the axioms of $\bf{TSCT}$ and move them to the meta--level obtaining a sub--theory $\bf{SSCT}$ of $\bf{TSCT}$. More accurately, we assign to each traditional higher--order axiom $\bf{TA}$ its simplified first--order version $\bf{SA}$ such that $\bf{TA}\vdash\bf{SA}$, i.e. $\bf{SA}$ can be logically derived from $\bf{TA}$. In this way we define a simpler and more accessible set of principles that provide a context in which we can prove many propositions analogous to well--known theorems including the Arrow's impossibility of Paretian non--dictatorship and Sen's impossibility of Paretian liberal. These simplifications are the result of decades of lecturing by the author with the aim of bridging the barriers between this beautiful complex theory and his students.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Branislav Boričić. 2024-04-13. Arrow-Sen theory simplified. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09018

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO