Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2404.14803

Cycling in the forest with Wilson's algorithm

Michaël Fanuel·Rémi Bardenet
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider a probability measure on cycle-rooted spanning forests (CRSFs) introduced by Kenyon. CRSFs are spanning subgraphs, each connected component of which has a unique cycle; they generalize spanning trees. A generalization of Wilson's celebrated CyclePopping algorithm for uniform spanning trees has been proposed for CRSFs, and several concise proofs have been given that the algorithm samples from Kenyon's distribution. In this survey, we flesh out all the details of such a proof of correctness, progressively generalizing a proof by Marchal for spanning trees. This detailed proof has several interests. First, it serves as a modern tutorial on Wilson's algorithm, suitable for applied probability and computer science audiences. Compared to uniform spanning trees, the more sophisticated motivating application to CRSFs brings forth connections to recent research topics such as loop measures, partial rejection sampling, and heaps of cycles. Second, the detailed proof \emph{\`a la} Marchal yields the law of the time complexity of the sampling algorithm, shedding light on practical situations where the algorithm is expected to run fast.

Explore related subjects

cs.DSmath-phmath.MPmath.PR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michaël Fanuel, Rémi Bardenet. 2024-04-23. Cycling in the forest with Wilson's algorithm. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14803

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗