Improved bounds for group testing in arbitrary hypergraphs

Annalisa De Bonis

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2404.18783

Improved bounds for group testing in arbitrary hypergraphs

Annalisa De Bonis

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recent papers initiated the study of a generalization of group testing where the potentially contaminated sets are the members of a given hypergraph F=(V,E). This generalization finds application in contexts where contaminations can be conditioned by some kinds of social and geographical clusterings. The paper focuses on few-stage group testing algorithms, i.e., slightly adaptive algorithms where tests are performed in stages and all tests performed in the same stage should be decided at the very beginning of the stage. In particular, the paper presents the first two-stage algorithm that uses o(dlog|E|) tests for general hypergraphs with hyperedges of size at most d, and a three-stage algorithm that improves by a d^{1/6} factor on the number of tests of the best known three-stage algorithm. These algorithms are special cases of an s-stage algorithm designed for an arbitrary positive integer s<= d. The design of this algorithm resort to a new non-adaptive algorithm (one-stage algorithm), i.e., an algorithm where all tests must be decided beforehand. Further, we derive a lower bound for non-adaptive group testing. For E sufficiently large, the lower bound is very close to the upper bound on the number of tests of the best non-adaptive group testing algorithm known in the literature, and it is the first lower bound that improves on the information theoretic lower bound Omega(log |E|).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Annalisa De Bonis. 2024-04-29. Improved bounds for group testing in arbitrary hypergraphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18783

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗