SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2405.01254

Optimal Lagrange Interpolation Projectors and Legendre Polynomials

Abstract

Let $K$ be a convex body in ${\mathbb R}^n$, and let $\Pi_1({\mathbb R}^n)$ be the space of polynomials in $n$ variables of degree at most $1$. Given an $(n+1)$-element set $Y\subset K$ in general position, we let $P_Y$ denote the Lagrange interpolation projector $P_Y: C(K)\to \Pi_1({\mathbb R}^n)$ with nodes in $Y$. In this paper, we study upper and lower bounds for the norm of the optimal Lagrange interpolation projector, i.e., the projector with minimal operator norm where the minimum is taken over all $(n+1)$-element sets of interpolation nodes in $K$. We denote this minimal norm by $\theta_n(K)$. Our main result, Theorem 5.2, provides an explicit lower bound for the constant $\theta_n(K)$ for an arbitrary convex body $K\subset{\mathbb R}^n$ and an arbitrary $n\ge 1$. We prove that $\theta_n(K)\ge \chi_n^{-1}\left({{\rm vol}(K)}/{{\rm simp}(K)}\right)$ where $\chi_n$ is the Legendre polynomial of degree $n$ and ${\rm simp}(K)$ is the maximum volume of a simplex contained in $K$. The proof of this result relies on a geometric characterization of the Legendre polynomials in terms of the volumes of certain convex polyhedra. More specifically, we show that for every $\gamma\ge 1$ the volume of the set $\left\{x=(x_1,...,x_n)\in{\mathbb R}^n : \sum |x_j| +\left|1- \sum x_j\right|\le\gamma\right\}$ is equal to ${\chi_n(\gamma)}/{n!}$. If $K$ is an $n$-dimensional ball, this approach leads us to the equivalence $\theta_n(K) \asymp\sqrt{n}$ which is complemented by the exact formula for $\theta_n(K)$. If $K$ is an $n$-dimensional cube, we obtain explicit efficient formulae for upper and lower bounds of the constant $\theta_n(K)$; moreover, for small $n$, these estimates enable us to compute the exact values of this constant.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mikhail Nevskii. 2024-05-02. Optimal Lagrange Interpolation Projectors and Legendre Polynomials. https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2024-3-316-337

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Tile sets consisting of two types of concave polygons derived from periodic tilings corresponding to non-periodic tilings with hat and turtle tiles

Using a convex pentagonal monotile belonging to the Type 5 family, we investigate the relationships among the hat tile, turtle tile, and Tile$(1, 1)$. By applying Sugimoto's Perspective and Amfirifma's Perspective, we obtain four types of concave polygons, AH-tile, BH-tile, AT-tile, and BT-tile, each having Heesch number 1 under the conditions considered. We show that these polygons correspond to clusters used to generate the non-periodic tilings $\mathscr{T}_h$ and $\mathscr{T}_s$. We further discuss the possibility that tile sets consisting of pairs selected from these polygons may correspond to $\textit{ASPmr}\{\text{A-tile}, \text{B-tile}\}$.

math.MG

The mean distance to a simple closed curve on the sphere

Kimberling's Problem 10 asks for a simple closed curve of prescribed length $L$ (in particular, $L=4\pi$) on the unit sphere minimizing the mean geodesic distance $\mathcal{J}$ from a point of the sphere to the curve. For a positive integer $n$, put $\vartheta_{n}=\pi/(2n)$ and $L_{n}=2\pi/\sin\vartheta_{n}$. We show that the minimum of $\mathcal{J}$ over rectifiable simple closed curves of length at most $L_{n}$ equals $\vartheta_{n}-\tan(\vartheta_{n}/2)$, that it is attained only by curves of length exactly $L_{n}$, and that the sphere-filling ropes $\beta^{n,k}$ of Gerlach and von der Mosel attain it. Kimberling's case is $n=3$: at $L=4\pi$ the minimum is $\pi/6+\sqrt{3}-2=0.255649\ldots$, attained by an explicit six-arc curve and by its mirror image. For $L\le2\pi$ we determine $J(L)$, the infimum of $\mathcal{J}$ over curves of length $L$, exactly: it equals $\pi/2-L/(2\pi)$, attained precisely by the circles of length $L$. At the lengths $L_{n}$ we do not classify all minimizers, but show that every one of them bisects the sphere into two disks of area $2\pi$ and inradius $\vartheta_{n}$ whose inward collars have the largest possible area at every depth. The great circle is the only minimizer for $n=1$, and the $\beta^{n,k}$ are, up to congruence, the only ones of thickness at least $\sin\vartheta_{n}$. For arbitrary $L$ the function $J$ is nonincreasing, and together with the above this brackets it between two explicit values.

math.MG

The topology of Gromov--Hausdorff space

We prove that the Gromov--Hausdorff space is homeomorphic to the Hilbert space. This paper is divided into four parts. In Part I, we construct an assignment of a full-support probability measure to every nonempty compact metric space that respects isometries and is continuous for simultaneous Hausdorff convergence of the spaces and weak convergence of the measures. In Part II, we use these measures to construct finite-dimensional local models whose induced pseudometrics approximate the original distances uniformly and whose norms and point maps vary continuously up to orthogonal changes of coordinates. In Part III, we use the local models to prove that the Gromov--Hausdorff space is an absolute retract for all metrizable spaces. In Part IV, we establish a discrete approximation property and conclude that the space of isometry classes of nonempty compact metric spaces is homeomorphic to the real separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.

math.MG