SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2405.08253

Thompson Sampling for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Decision Processes

Abstract

This paper develops a viable notion of learning for sampling-based algorithms that applies in broader settings than previously considered. More specifically, we model a discounted infinite-horizon MDPs with Borel state and action spaces, whose rewards and transitions depend on an unknown parameter. To analyze adaptive learning algorithms based on sampling we introduce a general canonical probability space in this setting. Since standard definitions of regret are inadequate for policy evaluation in this setting, we propose new metrics that arise from decomposing the standard expected regret in discounted infinite-horizon MDPs into three terms: (i) the expected finite-time regret, (ii) the expected state regret, and (iii) the expected residual regret. Component (i) translates into the traditional concept of expected regret over a finite horizon. Term (ii) reflects how much future performance is compromised at a given time because earlier decisions have led the system to a less favorable state than under an optimal policy. Finally, metric (iii) measures regret with respect to the optimal reward from the current period onward, disregarding the irreversible consequences of past decisions. We further disaggregate this term by introducing the probabilistic residual regret, a finer, sample-path version of (iii) that captures the remaining loss in future performance from the current period onward, conditional on the observed history. Its expectation coincides with (iii). We then focus on Thompson sampling (TS); under assumptions that extend those used in prior work on finite state and action spaces to the Borel setting, we show that component (iii) for TS converges to zero exponentially fast. We further show that, under mild conditions ensuring the existence of the relevant limits, its probabilistic counterpart converges to zero almost surely and TS achieves complete learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Adelman, Cagla Keceli, Alba V. Olivares-Nadal. 2024-05-14. Thompson Sampling for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Decision Processes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08253

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Hilbert-Valued Functional Decomposition Framework for Explaining Time-Dependent Outputs

Feature-based explanations quantify features' influence on model predictions, but are primarily designed for scalar outputs. In many applications, however, outputs are functional or multivariate, such as time-dependent trajectories in demand forecasting. Consequently, existing approaches typically explain each output location independently, ignoring dependencies across the output components. We address this limitation by developing a unified framework for feature-based explanations of time-dependent outputs. Specifically, we generalize functional decomposition to Hilbert-valued prediction functions and extend an existing feature-based explanation framework to this setting. Our framework introduces kernel-based output representations that enable time-dependency-aware explanations at multiple levels of temporal granularity, including time-specific, time-resolved, and time-aggregated, while providing a unified view in which existing methods arise as special cases. We validate our framework on synthetic and real-world data, including intraday financial market volatility prediction and energy demand forecasting.

stat.ML

Risk-Averse Decision Making with Multi-Level Reliability Guarantees

Many applications in engineering, including wireless broadcasting, require designs that provide performance certificates at different target outage levels. This paper studies the problem of maximizing the weighted average of such certificates in the presence of uncertainty about the true system state. The problem is shown to be equivalent to an optimization over nested prediction sets, connecting to the literature on conformal prediction and extending prior art on single-level risk-averse decision making. Furthermore, we derive a dual formulation that decouples optimization across input values. Numerical experiments on a diversity-based wireless transmission system illustrate the cost of enforcing multi-level certificates with a single shared policy and trace the Pareto trade-off between multiple reliability levels.

stat.ML

A distribution-free certification framework for trustworthy crash-severity prediction

Crash-severity models inform screening, dispatch and site prioritization, yet are deployed without a finite-sample statement of what one prediction means. Off-the-shelf guarantees fail here, because the features that make crash severity distinctive defeat them: the KABCO outcome is ordinal, the recorded label is a field assessment agreeing with medical severity about half the time, erring in a structured way, and deployment crosses jurisdictions and years calibration never saw. We develop a certification layer that wraps any severity model unmodified, with distribution-free guarantees using this structure: contiguous ordinal sets that read as "B or worse"; per-class validity for any pre-declared partition, with an oracle efficiency characterization; transfer of coverage to unobserved true severity through a declared reporting band, with a worst-case sharpness result; a one-sided certificate under deployment shift; and severity-weighted risk control. The guarantees compose with an attributable slack budget. The same analysis bounds what certification can achieve. A certified set's informativeness is governed by a functional of the true law that no base model can evade and that cannot be lower-bounded distribution-free; given a declared misreporting channel identified from record-linkage data, a nonvacuous lower bound on that floor becomes computable. On 5.2 million Texas records across seven base models spanning four decades, the layer attaches identical validity and certifies, on the vulnerable road users, a model-independent floor on set width that no base model beats, separating it from a remainder that stays bounded but distribution-free unidentifiable. The framework is released as an open-source package with theorem-level tests.

stat.ML