SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2405.09760

Combining RL and IL using a dynamic, performance-based modulation over learning signals and its application to local planning

Abstract

This paper proposes a method to combine reinforcement learning (RL) and imitation learning (IL) using a dynamic, performance-based modulation over learning signals. The proposed method combines RL and behavioral cloning (IL), or corrective feedback in the action space (interactive IL/IIL), by dynamically weighting the losses to be optimized, taking into account the backpropagated gradients used to update the policy and the agent's estimated performance. In this manner, RL and IL/IIL losses are combined by equalizing their impact on the policy's updates, while modulating said impact such that IL signals are prioritized at the beginning of the learning process, and as the agent's performance improves, the RL signals become progressively more relevant, allowing for a smooth transition from pure IL/IIL to pure RL. The proposed method is used to learn local planning policies for mobile robots, synthesizing IL/IIL signals online by means of a scripted policy. An extensive evaluation of the application of the proposed method to this task is performed in simulations, and it is empirically shown that it outperforms pure RL in terms of sample efficiency (achieving the same level of performance in the training environment utilizing approximately 4 times less experiences), while consistently producing local planning policies with better performance metrics (achieving an average success rate of 0.959 in an evaluation environment, outperforming pure RL by 12.5% and pure IL by 13.9%). Furthermore, the obtained local planning policies are successfully deployed in the real world without performing any major fine tuning. The proposed method can extend existing RL algorithms, and is applicable to other problems for which generating IL/IIL signals online is feasible. A video summarizing some of the real world experiments that were conducted can be found in https://youtu.be/mZlaXn9WGzw.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Francisco Leiva, Javier Ruiz-del-Solar. 2024-05-16. Combining RL and IL using a dynamic, performance-based modulation over learning signals and its application to local planning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09760

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO