SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2405.11134

On M\=adhava and his correction terms for the M\=adhava-Leibniz series for $\pi$

Abstract

This paper is intended to serve two purposes: one, to present an account of the life of Sangamagr\=ama M\=adhava, the founder of the Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics which flourished during the 15th - 18th centuries, based on modern historical scholarship and two, to present a critical study of the three enigmatic correction terms, attributed to M\=adhava, for obtaining more accurate values of $\pi$ while computing its value using the M\=adhava-Leibniz series. For the second purpose, we have collected together the original Sanskrit verses describing the correction terms, their English translations and their presentations in modern notations. The Kerala rationale for these correction terms are also critically examined. The general conclusion in this regard is that, even though the correction terms give high precision approximations to the value of $\pi$, the rationale presented by Kerala authors is not strong enough to convince modern mathematical scholarship. The author has extended M\=adhava's results by presenting higher order correction terms which yield better approximations to $\pi$ than the correction terms attributed to M\=adhava. The various infinite series representations of $\pi$ obtained by M\=adhava and his disciples from the basic M\=adhava-Leibniz series using M\=adhava's correction terms are also discussed. A few more such series representations using the better correction terms developed by the author are also presented. The various conjectures regarding how M\=adhava might have originally arrived at the correction terms are also discussed in the paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

V. N. Krishnachandran. 2024-05-18. On M\=adhava and his correction terms for the M\=adhava-Leibniz series for $\pi$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11134

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO