Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2405.17868

An algorithm applied the Turing pattern model to control active swarm robots using only information from neighboring modules

Takeshi Ishida
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Swarm robots, inspired by the emergence of animal herds, are robots that assemble a large number of modules and self-organize themselves to form specific morphologies and exhibit specific functions. These modular robots perform relatively simple actions and controls, and create macroscopic morphologies and functions through the interaction of a large number of modular robots. This research focuses on such self-organizing robots or swarm robots. The proposed algorithm is a model that applies the Turing pattern, one of the self-organization models, to make a group of modules accumulate and stay within a certain region. The proposed method utilizes the area within the spots of the Turing pattern as the aggregation region of the modules. Furthermore, it considers the value corresponding to the concentration distribution within the spotted pattern of the Turing pattern model (referred to as the potential value in this research), identifies the center of the region (spotted pattern), and makes it the center of the module group. By controlling the modules in the direction of the higher potential value, it succeeds in maintaining the shape of the module group as a whole while moving. The algorithm was validated using a two-dimensional simulation model. The unit module robot was assumed to have the following properties: 1) limited self-drive, 2) no module identifier, 3) information exchange only with adjacent modules, 4) no coordinate system, and 5) only simple arithmetic and memory functions. Using these modules, the devised algorithm was able to achieve not only the creation of static forms but also the realization of the following movements: 1) modules accumulate and grow, 2) modules move to the light source, 3) exit the gap while maintaining its shape, and 4) self-replication.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Takeshi Ishida. 2024-05-28. An algorithm applied the Turing pattern model to control active swarm robots using only information from neighboring modules. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17868

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗