Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2405.19493

Fast Gaussian Distributed Pseudorandom Number Generation in Java via the Ziggurat Algorithm

Vincent A. Cicirello
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We report on experiments with the ziggurat algorithm for generating Gaussian distributed random numbers. The study utilizes our open source Java implementation that was introduced originally for Java 11 at a time when the Java API only provided the much slower polar method. Our Java implementation of the ziggurat algorithm is a port of the GNU Scientific Library's C implementation. Java 17 introduced a significant overhaul of pseudorandom number generation, including several modern pseudorandom number generators (PRNGs) as well as additional functionality, among which includes switching from the polar method to a modified ziggurat algorithm. In the experiments of this paper, we explore whether there is still a need for our implementation for Java 17+ applications. Our results show that Java 17's modified ziggurat is faster than our implementation for the PRNGs that support it. However, Java 17+ continues to use the polar method for the legacy PRNGs Random, SecureRandom, and ThreadLocalRandom. The linear congruential method of Java's Random class lacks the statistical properties required by Java's modified ziggurat implementation; and SecureRandom and ThreadLocalRandom unfortunately use the polar method as a side-effect of extending Random. Our implementation of the original ziggurat algorithm does not require the same statistical properties of the underlying PRNG as Java 17's optimized version, and can be used with any of these PRNGs, and is especially relevant where pre-Java 17 support is required.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DMmath.PR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vincent A. Cicirello. 2024-05-29. Fast Gaussian Distributed Pseudorandom Number Generation in Java via the Ziggurat Algorithm. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19493

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗