Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2406.09420

Towards Single Slot Finality: Evaluating Consensus Mechanisms and Methods for Faster Ethereum Finality

Lincoln Murr
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Ethereum's current Gasper consensus mechanism, which combines the Latest Message Driven Greediest Heaviest Observed SubTree (LMD-GHOST) fork choice rule with the probabilistic Casper the Friendly Finality Gadget (FFG) finality overlay, finalizes transactions in 64 to 95 blocks, an approximate 15-minute delay. This finalization latency impacts user experience and exposes the network to short-term chain reorganization risks, potentially enabling transaction censorship or frontrunning by validators without severe penalties. As the ecosystem pursues a rollup-centric roadmap to scale Ethereum into a secure global settlement layer, faster finality allows cross-layer and inter-rollup communication with greater immediacy, reducing capital inefficiencies. Single slot finality (SSF), wherein transactions are finalized within the same slot they are proposed, promises to advance the Ethereum protocol and enable better user experiences by enabling near-instant economic finality. This thesis systematically studies distributed consensus protocols through propose-vote-merge, PBFT-inspired, and graded agreement families - scrutinizing their capacities to enhance or replace LMD-GHOST. The analysis delves into the intricate tradeoffs between safety, liveness, and finality, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities in designing an optimal consensus protocol for Ethereum. It also explores different design decisions and mechanisms by which single slot or fast finality can be enabled, including cumulative finality, subsampling, and application-layer fast finality. Furthermore, this work introduces SSF-enabled and streamlined fast finality constructions based on a single-vote total order broadcast protocol. The insights and recommendations in this thesis provide a solid foundation for the Ethereum community to make informed decisions regarding the future direction of the protocol's consensus.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lincoln Murr. 2024-03-21. Towards Single Slot Finality: Evaluating Consensus Mechanisms and Methods for Faster Ethereum Finality. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09420

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗