Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2406.10861

Knowledge Distillation in Federated Learning: a Survey on Long Lasting Challenges and New Solutions

Laiqiao Qin·Tianqing Zhu·Wanlei Zhou·Philip S. Yu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed and privacy-preserving machine learning paradigm that coordinates multiple clients to train a model while keeping the raw data localized. However, this traditional FL poses some challenges, including privacy risks, data heterogeneity, communication bottlenecks, and system heterogeneity issues. To tackle these challenges, knowledge distillation (KD) has been widely applied in FL since 2020. KD is a validated and efficacious model compression and enhancement algorithm. The core concept of KD involves facilitating knowledge transfer between models by exchanging logits at intermediate or output layers. These properties make KD an excellent solution for the long-lasting challenges in FL. Up to now, there have been few reviews that summarize and analyze the current trend and methods for how KD can be applied in FL efficiently. This article aims to provide a comprehensive survey of KD-based FL, focusing on addressing the above challenges. First, we provide an overview of KD-based FL, including its motivation, basics, taxonomy, and a comparison with traditional FL and where KD should execute. We also analyze the critical factors in KD-based FL in the appendix, including teachers, knowledge, data, and methods. We discuss how KD can address the challenges in FL, including privacy protection, data heterogeneity, communication efficiency, and personalization. Finally, we discuss the challenges facing KD-based FL algorithms and future research directions. We hope this survey can provide insights and guidance for researchers and practitioners in the FL area.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Laiqiao Qin, Tianqing Zhu, Wanlei Zhou, Philip S. Yu. 2024-06-16. Knowledge Distillation in Federated Learning: a Survey on Long Lasting Challenges and New Solutions. https://doi.org/10.1155/int%2F7406934

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗