SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2407.00734

Balanced Learned Sort: a new learned model for fast and balanced item bucketing

Abstract

This paper aims to better understand the strengths and limitations of adopting learned-based approaches in sequential sorting numerical data, via two main research steps. First, we study different learned models for distribution-based sorting, starting from some known ones (i.e., two-layer RMI or simple linear models) and then introducing some novel models that either improve the two-layer RMI or are fully new in their algorithmic structure thus resulting space efficient, monotonic, and very fast in building balanced buckets. We test those models over 11 synthetic datasets drawn from different distributions of 200M 64-bit floating-point items, so deriving hints about their ultimate performance and usefulness in designing a sorting algorithm. Based on these findings, we select and plug the best models from above in a new learned-based algorithmic scheme and devise three new sorters that we will test against other 6 sequential sorters (5 classic and 1 learned, known and new ones) over 33 datasets (11 synthetic and 22 real), whose size will be up to 800M items. Our experimental figures will show that our learned sorters achieve superior performance on 31 out of all 33 datasets (synthetic and real). In conclusion, these experimental results provide, on the one hand, a comprehensive answer to the main question: Which algorithmic structure for distribution-based sorting is suited to leverage a learned model in order to achieve efficient performance? and, on the other hand, they leave open several other research and engineering questions about the design of a highly performing sequential sorter that is robust over different input distributions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Paolo Ferragina, Mattia Odorisio. 2024-06-30. Balanced Learned Sort: a new learned model for fast and balanced item bucketing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00734

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS