Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.04342

A $\frac{4}{3}$-Approximation for the Maximum Leaf Spanning Arborescence Problem in DAGs

Meike Neuwohner
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Maximum Leaf Spanning Arborescence problem (MLSA) is defined as follows: Given a directed graph $G$ and a vertex $r\in V(G)$ from which every other vertex is reachable, find a spanning arborescence rooted at $r$ maximizing the number of leaves (vertices with out-degree zero). The MLSA has applications in broadcasting, where a message needs to be transferred from a source vertex to all other vertices along the arcs of an arborescence in a given network. In doing so, it is desirable to have as many vertices as possible that only need to receive, but not pass on messages since they are inherently cheaper to build. We study polynomial-time approximation algorithms for the MLSA. For general digraphs, the state-of-the-art is a $\min\{\sqrt{\mathrm{OPT}},92\}$-approximation. In the (still APX-hard) special case where the input graph is acyclic, the best known approximation guarantee of $\frac{7}{5}$ is due to Fernandes and Lintzmayer: They prove that any $\alpha$-approximation for the \emph{hereditary $3$-set packing problem}, a special case of weighted $3$-set packing, yields a $\max\{\frac{4}{3},\alpha\}$-approximation for the MLSA in acyclic digraphs (dags), and provide a $\frac{7}{5}$-approximation for the hereditary $3$-set packing problem. In this paper, we obtain a $\frac{4}{3}$-approximation for the hereditary $3$-set packing problem, and, thus, also for the MLSA in dags. In doing so, we manage to leverage the full potential of the reduction provided by Fernandes and Lintzmayer. The algorithm that we study is a simple local search procedure considering swaps of size up to $10$. Its analysis relies on a two-stage charging argument.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Meike Neuwohner. 2024-07-05. A $\frac{4}{3}$-Approximation for the Maximum Leaf Spanning Arborescence Problem in DAGs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04342

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗