SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2407.04900

Regret Optimality of Sample Average Approximation for Data-Driven Newsvendor Problems: A General Optimization Perspective

Abstract

Numerous existing studies have examined the performance of Sample Average Approximation (SAA) in the fundamental newsvendor problem. Despite these advances, critical gaps remain in two aspects. First, existing works focus on the linear-cost newsvendor problem and heavily rely on the quantile expression of the optimal solution. As a result, their analytical methods limit generalizability to more general inventory problems, where the optimal solution is not a quantile of the demand distribution. Second, even within the linear-cost setting, notable gaps exist between the state-of-the-art regret lower bound and upper bound for SAA under various conditions. In this paper, we generalize the structure of the newsvendor problem to generic convexity conditions and provide a unified regret analysis of SAA for general sequential stochastic optimization problems. Our approach provides further insights to a broader range of data-driven inventory problems, improves both the upper and lower regret bounds, and establishes the regret rate optimality of SAA. Our lower bound identifies the performance limit achievable by any policy for sequential stochastic optimization and inventory management problems, offering important guidance for future policy design in this area. Moreover, in empirical studies, SAA's performance is frequently used as a benchmark for evaluating new algorithms. The regret rate optimality result provides strong support for its role in assessing other data-driven methods, benefiting both practitioners and researchers. Our new analysis techniques enrich the analysis tools for regret upper and lower bounds for data-driven decision-making problems and other general stochastic optimization problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jiameng Lyu, Shilin Yuan, Bingkun Zhou, Yuan Zhou. 2024-07-06. Regret Optimality of Sample Average Approximation for Data-Driven Newsvendor Problems: A General Optimization Perspective. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04900

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG