SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2407.05372

A Convexified Matching Approach to Imputation and Individualized Inference

Abstract

We introduce a new convexified matching method for missing value imputation and individualized inference inspired by computational optimal transport. Our method integrates favorable features from mainstream imputation approaches: optimal matching, regression imputation, and synthetic control. We impute counterfactual outcomes based on convex combinations of observed outcomes, defined based on an optimal coupling between the treated and control data sets. The optimal coupling problem is considered a convex relaxation to the combinatorial optimal matching problem. We estimate granular-level individual treatment effects while maintaining a desirable aggregate-level summary by properly constraining the coupling. We construct transparent, individual confidence intervals for the estimated counterfactual outcomes. We devise fast iterative entropic-regularized algorithms to solve the optimal coupling problem that scales favorably when the number of units to match is large. Entropic regularization plays a crucial role in both inference and computation; it helps control the width of the individual confidence intervals and design fast optimization algorithms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

YoonHaeng Hur, Tengyuan Liang. 2024-07-07. A Convexified Matching Approach to Imputation and Individualized Inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05372

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM