SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2407.06913

A Simple, Nearly-Optimal Algorithm for Differentially Private All-Pairs Shortest Distances

Abstract

The all-pairs shortest distances (APSD) with differential privacy (DP) problem takes as input an undirected, weighted graph $G = (V,E, \mathbf{w})$ and outputs a private estimate of the shortest distances in $G$ between all pairs of vertices. In this paper, we present a simple $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/3}/\varepsilon)$-accurate algorithm to solve APSD with $\varepsilon$-DP, which reduces to $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/4}/\varepsilon)$ in the $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP setting, where $n = |V|$. Our algorithm greatly improves upon the error of prior algorithms, namely $\widetilde{O}(n^{2/3}/\varepsilon)$ and $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n}/\varepsilon)$ in the two respective settings, and is the first to be optimal up to a polylogarithmic factor, based on a lower bound of $\widetilde{\Omega}(n^{1/4})$. In the case where a multiplicative approximation is allowed, we give two different constructions of algorithms with reduced additive error. Our first construction allows a multiplicative approximation of $O(k\log{\log{n}})$ and has additive error $\widetilde{O}(k\cdot n^{1/k}/\varepsilon)$ in the $\varepsilon$-DP case and $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{k}\cdot n^{1/(2k)}/\varepsilon)$ in the $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP case. Our second construction allows multiplicative approximation $2k-1$ and has the same asymptotic additive error as the first construction. Both constructions significantly improve upon the currently best-known additive error of, $\widetilde{O}(k\cdot n^{1/2 + 1/(4k+2)}/\varepsilon)$ and $\widetilde{O}(k\cdot n^{1/3 + 2/(9k+3)}/\varepsilon)$, respectively. Our algorithms are straightforward and work by decomposing a graph into a set of spanning trees, and applying a key observation that we can privately release APSD in trees with $O(\text{polylog}(n))$ error.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jesse Campbell, Chunjiang Zhu. 2024-07-09. A Simple, Nearly-Optimal Algorithm for Differentially Private All-Pairs Shortest Distances. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06913

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS