Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.10697

Stiefel manifolds and upper bounds for spherical codes and packings

Masoud Zargar
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We improve upper bounds on sphere packing densities and sizes of spherical codes in high dimensions. In particular, we prove that the maximal sphere packing densities $\delta_n$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ satisfy \[\delta_n\leq \frac{1+o(1)}{e}\cdot \delta^{\text{KL}}_{n}\] for large $n$, where $\delta^{\text{KL}}_{n}$ is the best bound on $\delta_n$ obtained essentially by Kabatyanskii and Levenshtein from the 1970s with improvements over the years. We also obtain the same improvement factor for the maximal size $M(n,\theta)$ of $\theta$-spherical codes in $S^{n-1}$: for angles $0<\theta<\theta'\leq\frac{\pi}{2}$, \[M(n,\theta)\leq \frac{1+o(1)}{e}\cdot \frac{M_{\text{Lev}}(n-1,\theta')}{\mu_n(\theta,\theta')}\] for large $n$, where $\mu_n(\theta,\theta')$ is the mass of the spherical cap in the unit sphere $S^{n-1}$ of radius $\frac{\sin(\theta/2)}{\sin(\theta'/2)}$, and $M_{\text{Lev}}(n-1,\theta')$ is Levenshtein's upper bound on $M(n-1,\theta')$ when applying the Delsarte linear programming method to Levenshtein's optimal polynomials. In fact, we prove that there are no analytic losses in our arguments and that the constant $\frac{1}{e}=0.367...$ is optimal for the class of functions considered. Our results also show that the improvement factor does not depend on the special angle $\theta^*=62.997...^{\circ}$, explaining the numerics in arXiv:2001.00185. In the spherical codes case, the above inequality improves the Kabatyanskii--Levenshtein bound by a factor of $0.2304...$ on geometric average. Along the way, we construct a general class of functions using Stiefel manifolds for which we prove general results and study the improvement factors obtained from them in various settings.and study the improvement factors obtained from them in various settings.

Explore related subjects

math.MGcs.ITmath.COmath.IT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Masoud Zargar. 2024-07-15. Stiefel manifolds and upper bounds for spherical codes and packings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10697

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Tile sets consisting of two types of concave polygons derived from periodic tilings corresponding to non-periodic tilings with hat and turtle tiles

Using a convex pentagonal monotile belonging to the Type 5 family, we investigate the relationships among the hat tile, turtle tile, and Tile$(1, 1)$. By applying Sugimoto's Perspective and Amfirifma's Perspective, we obtain four types of concave polygons, AH-tile, BH-tile, AT-tile, and BT-tile, each having Heesch number 1 under the conditions considered. We show that these polygons correspond to clusters used to generate the non-periodic tilings $\mathscr{T}_h$ and $\mathscr{T}_s$. We further discuss the possibility that tile sets consisting of pairs selected from these polygons may correspond to $\textit{ASPmr}\{\text{A-tile}, \text{B-tile}\}$.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

The mean distance to a simple closed curve on the sphere

Kimberling's Problem 10 asks for a simple closed curve of prescribed length $L$ (in particular, $L=4\pi$) on the unit sphere minimizing the mean geodesic distance $\mathcal{J}$ from a point of the sphere to the curve. For a positive integer $n$, put $\vartheta_{n}=\pi/(2n)$ and $L_{n}=2\pi/\sin\vartheta_{n}$. We show that the minimum of $\mathcal{J}$ over rectifiable simple closed curves of length at most $L_{n}$ equals $\vartheta_{n}-\tan(\vartheta_{n}/2)$, that it is attained only by curves of length exactly $L_{n}$, and that the sphere-filling ropes $\beta^{n,k}$ of Gerlach and von der Mosel attain it. Kimberling's case is $n=3$: at $L=4\pi$ the minimum is $\pi/6+\sqrt{3}-2=0.255649\ldots$, attained by an explicit six-arc curve and by its mirror image. For $L\le2\pi$ we determine $J(L)$, the infimum of $\mathcal{J}$ over curves of length $L$, exactly: it equals $\pi/2-L/(2\pi)$, attained precisely by the circles of length $L$. At the lengths $L_{n}$ we do not classify all minimizers, but show that every one of them bisects the sphere into two disks of area $2\pi$ and inradius $\vartheta_{n}$ whose inward collars have the largest possible area at every depth. The great circle is the only minimizer for $n=1$, and the $\beta^{n,k}$ are, up to congruence, the only ones of thickness at least $\sin\vartheta_{n}$. For arbitrary $L$ the function $J$ is nonincreasing, and together with the above this brackets it between two explicit values.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

The topology of Gromov--Hausdorff space

We prove that the Gromov--Hausdorff space is homeomorphic to the Hilbert space. This paper is divided into four parts. In Part I, we construct an assignment of a full-support probability measure to every nonempty compact metric space that respects isometries and is continuous for simultaneous Hausdorff convergence of the spaces and weak convergence of the measures. In Part II, we use these measures to construct finite-dimensional local models whose induced pseudometrics approximate the original distances uniformly and whose norms and point maps vary continuously up to orthogonal changes of coordinates. In Part III, we use the local models to prove that the Gromov--Hausdorff space is an absolute retract for all metrizable spaces. In Part IV, we establish a discrete approximation property and conclude that the space of isometry classes of nonempty compact metric spaces is homeomorphic to the real separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.

math.MG↗