SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2407.10852

Cut-Preserving Vertex Sparsifiers for Planar and Quasi-bipartite Graphs

Abstract

We study vertex sparsification for preserving cuts. Given a graph $G$ with a subset $|T|=k$ of its vertices called terminals, a \emph{quality-$q$ cut sparsifier} is a graph $G'$ that contains $T$, such that, for any partition $(T_1,T_2)$ of $T$ into non-empty subsets, the value of the min-cut in $G'$ separating $T_1$ from $T_2$ is within factor $q$ from the value of the min-cut in $G$ separating $T_1$ from $T_2$. The construction of cut sparsifiers with good (small) quality and size has been a central problem in graph compression for years. Planar graphs and quasi-bipartite graphs are two important special families studied in this research direction. The main results in this paper are new cut sparsifier constructions for them in the high-quality regime (where $q=1$ or $1+\varepsilon$ for small $\varepsilon>0$). We first show that every planar graph admits a planar quality-$(1+\varepsilon)$ cut sparsifier of size $\tilde O(k/\text{poly}(\varepsilon))$, which is in sharp contrast with the lower bound of $2^{\Omega(k)}$ for the quality-$1$ case. We then show that every quasi-bipartite graph admits a quality-$1$ cut sparsifier of size $2^{\tilde O(k^2)}$. This is the second to improve over the doubly-exponential bound for general graphs (previously only planar graphs have been shown to have single-exponential size quality-$1$ cut sparsifiers). Lastly, we show that contraction, a common approach for constructing cut sparsifiers adopted in most previous works, does not always give optimal bounds for cut sparsifiers. We demonstrate this by showing that the optimal size bound for quality-$(1+\varepsilon)$ contraction-based cut sparsifiers for quasi-bipartite graphs lies in the range $[k^{\tilde\Omega(1/\varepsilon)},k^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)}]$, while in previous work an upper bound of $\tilde O(k/\varepsilon^2)$ was achieved via a non-contraction approach.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yu Chen, Zihan Tan. 2024-07-15. Cut-Preserving Vertex Sparsifiers for Planar and Quasi-bipartite Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10852

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS