arXiv · 2407.10889
Why Mg$_2$IrH$_6$ is predicted to be a high temperature superconductor, but Ca$_2$IrH$_6$ is not
Abstract
The X$_2$MH$_6$ family, consisting of an electropositive cation X and a main group metal M octahedrally coordinated by hydrogen, has been predicted to hold promise for high-temperature conventional superconductivity. Herein, we analyze the electronic structure of two members of this family, Mg$_2$IrH$_6$ and Ca$_2$IrH$_6$, showing why the former may possess superconducting properties rivaling those of the cuprates, whereas the latter does not. Within Mg$_2$IrH$_6$ the vibrations of the IrH$_6^{4-}$ anions are key for the superconducting mechanism, and they induce coupling in the $e_g^*$ set, which are antibonding between the H 1$s$ and the Ir $d_{x^2-y^2}$ or $d_{z^2}$ orbitals. Because calcium possesses low-lying d-orbitals, $e_g^* \rightarrow$ Ca $d$ back-donation is preferred, quenching the superconductivity. Our analysis explains why high critical temperatures were only predicted for second or third row X metal atoms, and may hold implications for superconductivity in other systems where the antibonding anionic states are filled.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Xiaoyu Wang, Warren Pickett, Micheal Hutcheon, Rohit Prasankumar, Eva Zurek. 2024-07-15. Why Mg$_2$IrH$_6$ is predicted to be a high temperature superconductor, but Ca$_2$IrH$_6$ is not. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10889
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.