Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.11342

GenTwoArmsTrialSize: An R Statistical Software Package to estimate Generalized Two Arms Randomized Clinical Trial Sample Size

Mohsen Soltanifar·Chel Hee Lee·Amin Shirazi·Martha Behnke·Ilfra Raymond-Loher·Getachew A. Dagne
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The precise calculation of sample sizes is a crucial aspect in the design of clinical trials particularly for pharmaceutical statisticians. While various R statistical software packages have been developed by researchers to estimate required sample sizes under different assumptions, there has been a notable absence of a standalone R statistical software package that allows researchers to comprehensively estimate sample sizes under generalized scenarios. This paper introduces the R statistical software package "GenTwoArmsTrialSize" available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN), designed for estimating the required sample size in two-arm clinical trials. The package incorporates four endpoint types, two trial treatment designs, four types of hypothesis tests, as well as considerations for noncompliance and loss of follow-up, providing researchers with the capability to estimate sample sizes across 24 scenarios. To facilitate understanding of the estimation process and illuminate the impact of noncompliance and loss of follow-up on the size and variability of estimations, the paper includes four hypothetical examples and one applied example. The discussion encompasses the package's limitations and outlines directions for future extensions and improvements.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mohsen Soltanifar, Chel Hee Lee, Amin Shirazi, Martha Behnke, Ilfra Raymond-Loher, Getachew A. Dagne. 2024-07-16. GenTwoArmsTrialSize: An R Statistical Software Package to estimate Generalized Two Arms Randomized Clinical Trial Sample Size. https://doi.org/10.29220/csam.2025.32.6.687

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗