Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.16278

Re-expression of manual expertise through semi-automatic control of a teleoperated system

Erwann Landais·Nasser Rezzoug·Vincent Padois
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

While the search for new solvents in the chemical industry is of uttermost importance with respect to environmental considerations, this domain remains strongly tied to highly manual and visual inspection tasks by human experts. As the manipulated chemicals may imply a critical danger (CMR substances), mechanical protection barrier are used (fume hoods, gloveboxes). This, in turn, can induce postural discomfort in the long term. Carrying out this task using a remotely controlled robot to reproduce the desired vial motions would alleviate these postural constraints. Nevertheless, the adoption of such a system will depend on its ability to transcribe the users' expertise. Particular attention must be paid to the intuitiveness of the system : transparency of the actions performed, relevance of the perceptual feedback, etc. and, in particular, the fidelity of the movements performed in relation to the user's commands. However, the extent of the rotational movements to be generated and the task interactivity complicates the problem both from the point of view of the motor capacities of industrial robots and for the transparency/responsiveness of the control.To tackle the problen of guaranteeing a secure and reactive expression of the manual characteristics of this task, we propose to separate the control of movement into two parts: control of the path (set of spatial poses) and of the trajectories associated with this path (speed, direction of travel along the path). The user can then partially control the robot's movements, by choosing the type of generic, secure path and modulating the trajectory performed on this path in real time. Although this drastically limits the possibilities for interaction, we assume that this teleoperated system can enable this type of observation task to be carried out as effectively as for direct manipulation. This hypothesis was tested through an experiment in which a reading task, less dangerous but with similar characteristics to the application task, had to be performed using different variants of trajectory modulation. This experiment consisted in reading words printed on four white capsules (dimensions 6 x 12 mm) placed into cylindrical vials ( dimensions 16 mm x 70 mm). Four randomly selected vials were tested by each variant. Firstly, users had to perform the task via direct handling, then under conditions secured by a protection barrier. Users were then invited to perform the task using different trajectory modulation variants (modulation and passive viewing of a pre-recorded video, modulation of the trajectory of a Franka-Emika Panda robot performing the task in real time in front of a monocular Logitech Brio 4K camera). After each trial of a variant, users evaluate different aspects of this variant (manual and visual performance, ease of use, acceptability of the interface) through a questionnaire. During the trials, various objective criteria are also measured (number and nature of interaction with the interface, time and degree of success in the task). This experiment was carried out with 37 subjects (age : 27$\pm$5, 20 females). The data recorded showed that the proportion of successes, as well as the subjects' perceptions of visual performance, comfort of use and acceptability of the interface, were similar and high for all the variants. This suggests that this task is indeed achievable via the proposed interface. However, data also showed that average task completion times when using the trajectory modulation variants were significantly higher than handling by hand variants, which implies that the proposed remote semi-automatic control procedure fails to achieve satisfactory performance regarding execution time. An interface allowing more reactive manipulation of the vial's movements seems necessary, and will be tested in a future experiment.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Erwann Landais, Nasser Rezzoug, Vincent Padois. 2024-07-23. Re-expression of manual expertise through semi-automatic control of a teleoperated system. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗