Multi-View Structural Graph Summaries

Jonatan Frank; Andor Diera; David Richerby; Ansgar Scherp

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.18036

Multi-View Structural Graph Summaries

Jonatan Frank·Andor Diera·David Richerby·Ansgar Scherp

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A structural graph summary is a small graph representation that preserves structural information necessary for a given task. The summary is used instead of the original graph to complete the task faster. We introduce multi-view structural graph summaries and propose an algorithm for merging two summaries. We conduct a theoretical analysis of our algorithm. We run experiments on three datasets, contributing two new ones. The datasets are of different domains (web graph, source code, and news) and sizes; the interpretation of multi-view depends on the domain and are pay-level domains on the web, control vs.\@ data flow of the code, and news broadcasters. We experiment with three graph summary models: attribute collection, class collection, and their combination. We observe that merging two structural summaries has an upper bound of quadratic complexity; but under reasonable assumptions, it has linear-time worst-case complexity. The running time of merging has a strong linear correlation with the number of edges in the two summaries. Therefore, the experiments support the assumption that the upper bound of quadratic complexity is not tight and that linear complexity is possible. Furthermore, our experiments show that always merging the two smallest summaries by the number of edges is the most efficient strategy for merging multiple structural summaries.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jonatan Frank, Andor Diera, David Richerby, Ansgar Scherp. 2024-07-25. Multi-View Structural Graph Summaries. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18036

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗