SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2408.01604

Efficient Data-driven Joint-level Calibration of Cable-driven Surgical Robots

Abstract

Knowing accurate joint positions is crucial for safe and precise control of laparoscopic surgical robots, especially for the automation of surgical sub-tasks. These robots have often been designed with cable-driven arms and tools because cables allow for larger motors to be placed at the base of the robot, further from the operating area where space is at a premium. However, by connecting the joint to its motor with a cable, any stretch in the cable can lead to errors in kinematic estimation from encoders at the motor, which can result in difficulties for accurate control of the surgical tool. In this work, we propose an efficient data-driven calibration of positioning joints of such robots, in this case the RAVEN-II surgical robotics research platform. While the calibration takes only 8-21 minutes, the accuracy of the calibrated joints remains high during a 6-hour heavily loaded operation, suggesting desirable feasibility in real practice. The calibration models take original robot states as input and are trained using zig-zag trajectories within a desired sparsity, requiring no additional sensors after training. Compared to fixed offset compensation, the Deep Neural Network calibration model can further reduce 76 percent of error and achieve accuracy of 0.104 deg, 0.120 deg, and 0.118 mm in joints 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In contrast to end-to-end models, experiments suggest that the DNN model achieves better accuracy and faster convergence when outputting the error to correct original inaccurate joint positions. Furthermore, a linear regression model is shown to have 160 times faster inference speed than DNN models for application within the 1000 Hz servo control loop, with slightly compromised accuracy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Haonan Peng, Andrew Lewis, Yun-Hsuan Su, Shan Lin, Dun-Tin Chiang, Wenfan Jiang, Helen Lai, Blake Hannaford. 2024-08-02. Efficient Data-driven Joint-level Calibration of Cable-driven Surgical Robots. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01604

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO