arXiv · 2408.12932
Broad versus narrow research questions in evidence synthesis: a parallel to (and plea for) estimands
Abstract
There has been a transition from broad to more specific research questions in the practice of network meta-analysis (NMA). Such convergence is also taking place in the context of individual registrational trials, following the recent introduction of the estimand framework, which is impacting the design, data collection strategy, analysis and interpretation of clinical trials. The language of estimands has much to offer to NMA, particularly given the "narrow" perspective of treatments and target populations taken in health technology assessment.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Antonio Remiro-Azócar, Anders Gorst-Rasmussen. 2024-08-23. Broad versus narrow research questions in evidence synthesis: a parallel to (and plea for) estimands. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1741
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.