SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2408.14638

New weighted additive spanners

Abstract

Ahmed, Bodwin, Sahneh, Kobourov, and Spence (WG 2020) introduced additive spanners for weighted graphs and constructed (i) a $+2W_{\max}$ spanner with $O(n^{3/2})$ edges and (ii) a $+4W_{\max}$ spanner with $\tilde{O}(n^{7/5})$ edges, and (iii) a $+8W_{\max}$ spanner with $O(n^{4/3})$ edges, for any weighted graph with $n$ vertices. Here $W_{\max} = \max_{e\in E}w(e)$ is the maximum edge weight in the graph. Their results for $+2W_{\max}$, $+4W_{\max}$, and $+8W_{\max}$ match the state-of-the-art bounds for the unweighted counterparts where $W_{\max} = 1$. They left open the question of constructing a $+6W_{\max}$ spanner with $O(n^{4/3})$ edges. Elkin, Gitlitz, and Neiman (DISC 2021) made significant progress on this problem by showing that there exists a $+(6+\epsilon)W_{\max}$ spanner with $O(n^{4/3}/\epsilon)$ edges for any fixed constant $\epsilon > 0$. Indeed, their result is stronger as the additive stretch is local: the stretch for any pair $u,v$ is $+(6+\epsilon)W_{uv}$ where $W_{uv}$ is the maximum weight edge on the shortest path from $u$ to $v$. In this work, we resolve the problem posted by Ahmed et al. (WG 2020) up to a poly-logarithmic factor in the number of edges: We construct a $+6W_{\max}$ spanner with $\tilde{O}(n^{4/3})$ edges. We extend the construction for $+6$-spanners of Woodruff (ICALP 2010), and our main contribution is an analysis tailoring to the weighted setting. The stretch of our spanner could also be made local, in the sense of Elkin, Gitlitz, and Neiman (DISC 2021). We also study the fast constructions of additive spanners with $+6W_{\max}$ and $+4W_{\max}$ stretches. We obtain, among other things, an algorithm for constructing a $+(6+\epsilon)W_{\max}$ spanner of $\tilde{O}(\frac{n^{4/3}}{\epsilon})$ edges in $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

An La, Hung Le. 2024-08-26. New weighted additive spanners. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14638

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS