SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2409.07547

Machine Learning and Constraint Programming for Efficient Healthcare Scheduling

Abstract

Solving combinatorial optimization problems involve satisfying a set of hard constraints while optimizing some objectives. In this context, exact or approximate methods can be used. While exact methods guarantee the optimal solution, they often come with an exponential running time as opposed to approximate methods that trade the solutions quality for a better running time. In this context, we tackle the Nurse Scheduling Problem (NSP). The NSP consist in assigning nurses to daily shifts within a planning horizon such that workload constraints are satisfied while hospitals costs and nurses preferences are optimized. To solve the NSP, we propose implicit and explicit approaches. In the implicit solving approach, we rely on Machine Learning methods using historical data to learn and generate new solutions through the constraints and objectives that may be embedded in the learned patterns. To quantify the quality of using our implicit approach in capturing the embedded constraints and objectives, we rely on the Frobenius Norm, a quality measure used to compute the average error between the generated solutions and historical data. To compensate for the uncertainty related to the implicit approach given that the constraints and objectives may not be concretely visible in the produced solutions, we propose an alternative explicit approach where we first model the NSP using the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) framework. Then we develop Stochastic Local Search methods and a new Branch and Bound algorithm enhanced with constraint propagation techniques and variables/values ordering heuristics. Since our implicit approach may not guarantee the feasibility or optimality of the generated solution, we propose a data-driven approach to passively learn the NSP as a constraint network. The learned constraint network, formulated as a CSP, will then be solved using the methods we listed earlier.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aymen Ben Said, Malek Mouhoub. 2024-09-11. Machine Learning and Constraint Programming for Efficient Healthcare Scheduling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07547

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI