Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2409.17715

Optimal Sensitivity Oracle for Steiner Mincut

Koustav Bhanja
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Let $G=(V,E)$ be an undirected weighted graph on $n=|V|$ vertices and $S\subseteq V$ be a Steiner set. Steiner mincut is a well-studied concept, which provides a generalization to both (s,t)-mincut (when $|S|=2$) and global mincut (when $|S|=n$). Here, we address the problem of designing a compact data structure that can efficiently report a Steiner mincut and its capacity after the failure of any edge in $G$; such a data structure is known as a \textit{Sensitivity Oracle} for Steiner mincut. In the area of minimum cuts, although many Sensitivity Oracles have been designed in unweighted graphs, however, in weighted graphs, Sensitivity Oracles exist only for (s,t)-mincut [Annals of Operations Research 1991, NETWORKS 2019, ICALP 2024], which is just a special case of Steiner mincut. Here, we generalize this result to any arbitrary set $S\subseteq V$. 1. Sensitivity Oracle: Assuming the capacity of every edge is known, a. there is an ${\mathcal O}(n)$ space data structure that can report the capacity of Steiner mincut in ${\mathcal O}(1)$ time and b. there is an ${\mathcal O}(n(n-|S|+1))$ space data structure that can report a Steiner mincut in ${\mathcal O}(n)$ time after the failure of any edge in $G$. 2. Lower Bound: We show that any data structure that, after the failure of any edge, can report a Steiner mincut or its capacity must occupy $\Omega(n^2)$ bits of space in the worst case, irrespective of the size of the Steiner set. The lower bound in (2) shows that the assumption in (1) is essential to break the $\Omega(n^2)$ lower bound on space. For $|S|=n-k$ for any constant $k\ge 0$, it occupies only ${\mathcal O}(n)$ space. So, we also present the first Sensitivity Oracle occupying ${\mathcal O}(n)$ space for global mincut.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Koustav Bhanja. 2024-09-26. Optimal Sensitivity Oracle for Steiner Mincut. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17715

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗